Posts

Russia-Gate Enters the 5.09 Record: Dr. Bradley Foerster’s November 17, 2018 Letter, Foerster v. Cronin as University Exhibit 39, and the Final Medical School Ad Hoc Committee Hearing

Image
November 17, 2018 — Before the Second 5.09 Hearing Early on November 17, 2018, before the second of three scheduled hearings in his University of Michigan Regents’ Bylaw 5.09 dismissal proceedings, Dr. Bradley Foerster sent a written letter to Executive Vice Dean Dr. Carol Bradford and the University hearing committee. The letter was copied to University attorney Daniel Tukel, University President Dr. Mark Schlissel, Provost Dr. Martin Philbert, Medical School Dean Dr. Marschall Runge, Dr. Paul Cronin, Dr. Myria Petrou, and Ms. Duaa Altaee . Dr. Foerster placed credibility at the center of the letter. He wrote that the principal effect of the draft Hall Render reports and proposed dismissal was to “attack and undermine my credibility.” He contrasted that with Mr. Tukel’s portrayal of him as someone who, at age 45, had suddenly become a “shady character,” “spun conspiracies,” engaged in fraudulent activity, committed court infractions, and attacked the University. ...
Read more

University of Michigan’s 2020 Bylaw 5.09 Rewrite Addressed Procedural and Substantive Issues Dr. Bradley Foerster Had Already Raised

Image
In May 2020, the University of Michigan substantially revised Regents’ Bylaw 5.09, the University-wide procedure governing dismissal, demotion, and terminal appointment of tenured and tenure-track faculty. The University conducted Dr. Bradley Foerster’s 2018–2019 dismissal proceeding under the prior April 2011 version of Bylaw 5.09. During that proceeding, Dr. Foerster placed multiple procedural objections into the University record concerning the structure of the initial hearing, the substantive grounds for dismissal, the applicable standard of proof, advance access to evidence, potential bias, procedural timing, and academic-freedom protections . The comparison below examines the procedure governing the Foerster proceeding, the objections Dr. Foerster documented during that proceeding, and the procedure the University adopted in May 2020. 1. The 2020 Revision Replaced the Former School-Level/SACUA Initial-Hearing Split The April 2011 Bylaw c...
Read more

Sexual-Harassment Case, “Restitution and Debarment,” and One Withheld FBI Record: Drs. Bradley Foerster and Myria Petrou Ask the University of Michigan Senate Advisory Committee on University Affairs Whether Any Undisclosed Agreements Exist

Image
On October 18, 2026, Dr. Bradley Foerster and Dr. Myria Petrou asked the Senate Advisory Committee on University Affairs (SACUA) to help obtain records addressing several unresolved matters: whether any undisclosed agreement, acknowledgment, or restriction concerned the sexual-harassment case; what occurred during the documented restitution and debarment processes; and what is contained in the FBI-generated record withheld by the University of Michigan. The questions arise from the sequence surrounding the sexual-harassment case. Shortly before the University’s Office for Institutional Equity/Title IX report was dated, Dr. Robert Welsh sent a cease-and-desist letter asserting that Dr. Petrou, Duaa Altaee, and Dr. Foerster had fabricated the allegations and were “bad actors.” During the subsequent grant arbitration, Dr. Ray Hutchinson opposed Dr. Foerster discussing the sexual-harassment case. The Office for Institutional Equity/...
Read more

“Restitution and Debarment Both in Process”: Drs. Bradley Foerster and Myria Petrou Seek Answers About One FBI Record Withheld by the University of Michigan, NIH Grant Funds, and Federal Prosecution Agreements

Image
One day after Dr. Bradley Foerster and Dr. Myria Petrou asked University of Michigan General Counsel Patricia Petrowski to meet with them about federal records documenting restitution and debarment, Dr. Foerster filed a targeted Univeristy of Michigan FOIA request. The October 17, 2026 request asks whether money was returned or transferred in connection with Dr. Foerster, Dr. Petrou, Duaa Altaee, or NIH ALS Grant R01NS082304—and whether any agreement governed restitution or the disposition of federal criminal charges. Neither Dr. Foerster nor Dr. Petrou knew that any restitution or debarment process was underway. Neither was aware of or had authorized any agreement concerning restitution, debarment, a transfer of funds, or the disposition of federal charges. One FBI-Generated Record Identified—and Withheld in Full On April 21, 2026, the University responded to Dr. Myria Petrou’s broad request for FBI-generated records received ...
Read more

Criminal Prosecution Declined, Restitution and Debarment “Both in Process”: Dr. Bradley Foerster and Dr. Myria Petrou Ask University of Michigan General Counsel Patricia Petrowski for Answers

Image
On October 16, 2026, Dr. Bradley Foerster and Dr. Myria Petrou asked University of Michigan General Counsel Patricia Petrowski to meet and explain University counsel’s involvement in restitution and debarment discussions concerning NIH-funded ALS Grant R01NS082304. The request follows years of efforts to establish what happened after Dr. Foerster and Dr. Petrou reported misconduct involving the grant. Duaa Altaee reported sexual harassment and retaliation arising from Ms. Altaee’s grant work. Dr. Petrou supported Ms. Altaee through the University’s OIE/Title IX process. Dr. Foerster separately reported grant-related retaliation to that office. Dr. Foerster and Dr. Petrou also raised concerns about grant funds, and Dr. Petrou submitted a grant complaint to HHS-OIG in July 2017. The University subsequently relied on concerns attributed to HHS-OIG in Dr. Foerster’s dismissal proceedings. The dismissal charge letter also cited Dr. Foerster’s repor...
Read more

Drs. Bradley Foerster and Myria Petrou Ask Former Attorneys Michael Reynolds and Mark Evans About Bank of Ann Arbor’s $1.4 Million Sheriff’s-Sale Credit Bid, Possible Third-Party Agreements, and Unanswered Requests for Mortgage Records (2017–2026)

Image
On October 12, 2026 , Drs. Bradley Foerster and Myria Petrou renewed their request for answers from attorneys Michael Reynolds and Mark Evans , who represented Dr. Foerster and Dr. Petrou in the Bank of Ann Arbor foreclosure and related litigation through late 2017. Nearly nine years after the August 3, 2017 sheriff's sale of 1745 Brian Court and 620 and 630 Geddes Ridge Avenue , fundamental questions about the disposition of the sale proceeds remain unanswered. Bank of Ann Arbor has not reconciled its approximately $1.4 million sheriff's-sale credit bid with the principal reduction and charge-off recorded in the Bank's own loan ledger , despite more than two years of requests. Dr. Foerster and Dr. Petrou also asked Mr. Reynolds and Mr. Evans for mortgage and encumbrance records that the FDIC indicated had been provided during litigation and discovery. Neither attorney has provided the records or a substantive response. T...
Read more