Dr. Bradley Foerster Files Litigated FOIA Appeal Following President Grasso Denial – Medical Peer Review Decision (Psychiatry)
Following a documented FOIA denial and administrative appeal process, Dr. Bradley Foerster—who was the subject of the peer review—filed a litigated FOIA appeal seeking access to the peer review decision conducted by a psychiatrist. Federal law requires that individuals subject to professional medical peer review have access to the results and rationale of decisions affecting their professional standing. The University declined to produce the decision, including the outcome and its basis.
This litigated FOIA appeal follows a documented administrative record reflecting the University of Michigan’s denial of access to the peer review decision and its underlying basis.
The appeal raises questions regarding transparency, compliance with
National Practitioner Data Bank (NPDB) Record
The underlying record also includes independent federal reporting data.
A self-query response from the National Practitioner Data Bank (NPDB), processed April 4, 2026, reflects no reportable events associated with Dr. Bradley Foerster.
No Reports Found Based on the Subject Information Submitted.
NPDB self-query response for Dr. Bradley Foerster (April 4, 2026)
Related Reporting
- DOJ Confirms 500+ Page FBI File on Bradley Foerster in Russia-Gate FOIA Case; Records Set for Release May 4, 2026
- President Grasso Denies Foerster FOIA Appeal – UMPD Police Report Referenced in AAPD Communication (Dr. Eva Feldman)
- Ann Arbor Independent Community Police Oversight Committee Review of $1.4M Missing Funds From Sheriff’s Sale
- Dr. Bradley Foerster Files Litigated FOIA Appeal Following President Grasso Denial – Medical Peer Review Decision (Psychiatry)






