Dr. Bradley Foerster Files Litigated FOIA Appeal Following President Grasso Denial – Medical Peer Review Decision (Psychiatry)
Following a documented FOIA denial and administrative appeal process, Dr. Bradley Foerster—who was the subject of the peer review—filed a litigated FOIA appeal seeking access to the peer review decision conducted by a psychiatrist. Federal law requires that individuals subject to professional medical peer review have access to the results and rationale of decisions affecting their professional standing. The University declined to produce the decision, including the outcome and its basis.
This litigated FOIA appeal follows a documented administrative record reflecting the University of Michigan’s denial of access to the peer review decision and its underlying basis.
The appeal raises questions regarding transparency, compliance with
National Practitioner Data Bank (NPDB) Record
The underlying record also includes independent federal reporting data.
A self-query response from the National Practitioner Data Bank (NPDB), processed April 4, 2026, reflects no reportable events associated with Dr. Bradley Foerster.
No Reports Found Based on the Subject Information Submitted.
NPDB self-query response for Dr. Bradley Foerster (April 4, 2026)
Related Reporting
- The Institutional Fingerprint of the FBI Russia-Gate File
- May 12, 2026 Joint Status Report Filed After FBI Missed May 4 Production Deadline in “Russia-Gate” FOIA Litigation; New Production Dates Set for May 15 and June 16, 2026
- University of Michigan States No Responsive Documents Exist Regarding Dr. Foerster’s 2018 Psychiatric Peer Review Following Litigated FOIA Appeal
- Bank of Ann Arbor Reported $1,412,380 Sheriff's Sale Purchase; Follow-Up RESPA Request Seeks Reconciliation Record






