University of Michigan Withholds Notice of 2018 Peer Review Evaluation and Forces Additional FOIA Request Over Delayed Appeal Response
No notice was ever provided regarding a 2018 peer review evaluation conducted by psychiatrist Dr. Kirk Brower while the Dr. Bradley Foerster was on approved medical leave, raising concerns under federal disability and due process protections.
After discovering that the Health Care Quality Improvement Act (HCQIA) requires notice to the physician, a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request was submitted to the University of Michigan seeking records related to the peer review notice. The University denied the request, citing a “peer review exemption.”
Withholding a Notice Raises Basic Due Process Questions
This denial presents two fundamental issues.
First, a notice—by definition—is intended to inform the physician subject to review. In this case, no notice of the 2018 peer review evaluation was ever received, raising questions as to whether any meaningful notice was provided at all.
Second, the failure to produce a notice implicates federal due process standards governing professional review actions.
HCQIA Requires Adequate Notice
Under the Health Care Quality Improvement Act (HCQIA), professional review actions must satisfy specific procedural requirements, including the provision of adequate notice.
42 U.S.C. § 11112 – Standards for Professional Review Actions
- (1) in the reasonable belief that it furthers quality health care;
- (2) after a reasonable effort to obtain the facts;
- (3) after adequate notice and hearing procedures are afforded to the physician; and
- (4) in the reasonable belief that the action is warranted by the known facts.
The statute further provides that adequate notice includes informing the physician of:
- the proposed action; and
- the reasons for the action.
No such notice of the 2018 peer review evaluation was ever provided.
Delayed Appeal Response Prompted Additional FOIA Request
An administrative FOIA appeal of the University’s denial was submitted to President Grasso. That appeal was not resolved within the timeframe required under Michigan FOIA, and no timely response was issued.
As a result, a separate FOIA request was required to obtain records concerning the delayed appeal response, including documentation reflecting the timing and handling of the President’s determination.
This additional request was necessary to compel clarification of both the procedural handling of the FOIA appeal and the University’s position regarding the peer review notice.
FOIA Denial for Dr. Bradley Foerster's Peer Review Notice
Selected Reporting
- From Mentor to Federal Investigation: The Dr. Eva Feldman Documentary Chronology
- July 26 Documentary Notice and Documentary Chronology Transmitted to City Attorney Kaur, Mayor Taylor, City Administrator Dohoney, and Police Chief Anderson Concerning Ann Arbor Police Department Investigations, Related City Proceedings, and Federal Investigations Involving Drs. Bradley Foerster and Myria Petrou (2015–2026).
- July 7 Documentary Notice to University of Michigan Vice President and General Counsel Timothy G. Lynch Concerning University and Law Enforcement Investigations Involving Drs. Bradley Foerster and Myria Petrou (2015–2026). July 8 UM Announces Lynch Leaving.
- From One FBI File to a Legislative Proposal: Peter and Maria Foerster Ask Senator Van Hollen's Office and Congressman Jamie Raskin to Consider a Uniform Administrative Framework for Federal Investigations
- The Institutional Fingerprint of the FBI Russia-Gate File: Referrals, Consults, Intelligence Reports, and the June 16, 2026 FBI Production
- Dr. Bradley Foerster and Dr. Myria Petrou Document More Than Two Years of Unsuccessful Efforts to Trace Bank of Ann Arbor's $1.4 Million Sheriff's Sale Credit Bid (June 2026)

.png)
