November 2018 5.09 Testimony of AAPD Detective Spickard Concerning Search Warrant Process and Missing Court File
Search warrants require a court file.
No such file appears in the record.
During Dr. Bradley Foerster’s November 2018 University of Michigan 5.09 proceedings, AAPD Detective Spickard was called as one of four witnesses against Dr. Foerster.
During cross-examination, Dr. Foerster questioned Detective Spickard concerning the Ann Arbor Police Department search warrant process associated with the underlying investigation.
During testimony, Detective Spickard stated that records associated with the search warrant process would be maintained through the court record and transcript process.
“it all be on the record… through the court record and the transcript… The court maintains those files.”
— AAPD Detective Spickard (Bylaw 5.09 testimony)
These excerpts are drawn from testimony presented during University of Michigan Bylaw 5.09 proceedings involving Dr. Bradley Foerster.
Exhibit — Testimony of Detective Spickard (Bylaw 5.09 Proceedings)
Related Testimony — Attorney Cyril Hall (appearing as a witness, Bylaw 5.09 Proceedings)
A court file is required. None appears in the record.
Related Reporting
- The Institutional Fingerprint of the FBI Russia-Gate File
- May 12, 2026 Joint Status Report Filed After FBI Missed May 4 Production Deadline in “Russia-Gate” FOIA Litigation; New Production Dates Set for May 15 and June 16, 2026
- University of Michigan States No Responsive Documents Exist Regarding Dr. Foerster’s 2018 Psychiatric Peer Review Following Litigated FOIA Appeal
- Bank of Ann Arbor Reported $1,412,380 Sheriff's Sale Purchase; Follow-Up RESPA Request Seeks Reconciliation Record