Filed Federal Exhibit: “My Concerns Regarding These Records Are Not Academic”
A Supplemental Exhibit filed May 9, 2026 in Foerster v. U.S. Department of Justice, Case No. 1:25-cv-03277-CJN, documented communications between Plaintiff Dr. Bradley Foerster and Assistant United States Attorney Kimberly Stratton concerning the FBI’s missed May 4, 2026 production deadline, revised anticipated production dates, and records identified in the pending FOIA litigation.
Supplemental Exhibit filed May 9, 2026 in Foerster v. U.S. Department of Justice, Case No. 1:25-cv-03277-CJN.
“As we also discussed, my concerns regarding these records are not academic. Given the involvement of law enforcement and multiple institutional actors, transparency regarding the underlying records is important both for accountability and for the safety and security of my family.”
The filed exhibit additionally referenced the FBI’s identification of approximately “5 minutes of audio media potentially responsive” together with approximately 522 pages of potentially responsive records.
May 8, 2026 email correspondence filed as Exhibit A, referencing responsive audio media, University of Michigan withheld records, and transparency concerns.
Related filing:
Joint Status Report Filed in FBI “Russia-Gate” FOIA Litigation Setting New May 15 and June 16, 2026 FBI Production Deadlines
Related Reporting
- The Institutional Fingerprint of the FBI Russia-Gate File
- May 12, 2026 Joint Status Report Filed After FBI Missed May 4 Production Deadline in “Russia-Gate” FOIA Litigation; New Production Dates Set for May 15 and June 16, 2026
- University of Michigan States No Responsive Documents Exist Regarding Dr. Foerster’s 2018 Psychiatric Peer Review Following Litigated FOIA Appeal
- Bank of Ann Arbor Reported $1,412,380 Sheriff's Sale Purchase; Follow-Up RESPA Request Seeks Reconciliation Record