Brad Files Supplemental Exhibit to Michigan Court of Claims To Document that University of Michigan Violates Statutes & Regulations (Including Its Own) to Come After Brad and His Family
Does anyone believe that my 5.09 proceedings met the primary role of the hearings at outlined in the below University of Michigan SACUA Overview document: that the hearings were fair to all parties? If the University if willing to violate one of its own most important laws governing critical faculty issues what else would it be willing to violate?
Related Reporting
- DOJ Confirms 500+ Page FBI File on Bradley Foerster in Russia-Gate FOIA Case; Records Set for Release May 4, 2026
- President Grasso Denies Foerster FOIA Appeal – UMPD Police Report Referenced in AAPD Communication (Dr. Eva Feldman)
- Ann Arbor Independent Community Police Oversight Committee Review of $1.4M Missing Funds From Sheriff’s Sale
- Dr. Bradley Foerster Files Litigated FOIA Appeal Following President Grasso Denial – Medical Peer Review Decision (Psychiatry)
Brad Foerster, MD PhD
Brad Foerster is a FOIA advocate documenting requests, transparency disputes, and accountability investigations involving public agencies, universities, police oversight, and Russia-Gate related inquiries. His work compiles original documents, timelines, and analysis of public records and institutional responses. Brad is also a board-certified radiologist, author of Town & Gown, and has published over 40 peer-reviewed articles. Brad lives in Potomac, Maryland with his family and is active in the Montgomery County Medical Society and the Takoma Park U.S. & World History Book Club.